Google+

Is Windows 7 a revolution for PC gamers?

The problems back then were strictly business because while devs such as Crytek – who build their reps by being seen to be producing PC games at the cutting-edge in terms of graphics – were keen to push DirectX 10 to its limits, the DX9-to-DirectX 10 transition was still “somewhat painful, even for those companies,” according to AMD.


Above: Richard Huddy, AMD

Fast-forward to today and Huddy is adamant that this is the best DirectX transition he’s ever seen, simply because there’s a substantial installed base of 50% of Vista users, who can run DirectX11 games as soon as they install Windows 7. This instantly changes the market dynamic for any PC games publisher or developer.

“So you can see why Windows 7 is a really far more attractive proposition for games developers,” argues the AMD man. “I mean, being one of the leading vendors for DirectX 11 hardware in the market, I’m bound to say that it’s great, aren’t I? Gamers can decide for themselves in time whether it’s true.

“The best thing is that I can back that statement up with the fact that – unlike the fix or six months gap between DirectX 10 hardware launching and the first games arriving – there were DirectX 11 games on the shelf before there was any hardware available.”

He’s only right as well. EA’s BattleForge, for example, was out back in '09 and there’s also a bunch of other DirectX 11 games out now (like DiRT 2), and due early in 2010, such as STALKER: Call of Pripyat, as well as new DirectX 11 game engines from the likes of Eastern European devs such as Unigen. So there was a lot of DirectX 11 code out there within weeks of Windows 7’s launch.

As is always the case though, to get the best out of Windows 7 gaming you are going to need the best DirectX 11 graphics hardware you can afford. This is because, in addition to Microsoft’s software innovations, DirectX 11 is based on a number of technical innovations made in graphics processor units (GPUs). One of the main benefits here is tessellation – a technology which lets your PC create a large number of highly detailed triangles inside the graphics card.

On top of that, you have the new Shader Model 5, “which runs something like BattleForge a staggering 30% faster than it would on DX 10.1 hardware” claims AMD.

And these two features alone give games developers a lot to play with. Instead of having 5-10 million triangles per second on screen at any one time, they can now have hundreds of millions. Most importantly this lets artists introduce the smooth curves that they had in mind for the art style in their games. And it’s allowing some devs, such as Rebellion, to achieve a massive quality win within games such as Aliens vs Predator, all at hardly any extra cost.


Above: And what will this mean for Games for Windows?

What all this means is that PC game developers can now start to release the best-quality DirectX 11 versions of their games that will be sure to run on the widest possible range of hardware out there. “It’s not just an option anymore,” says AMD’s Huddy, “it’s actually the most sensible business decision for them to make.”

For now Windows 7 offers better graphics and a stable platform. And for the future? Who knows.

We Recommend By ZergNet

15 comments

  • Cogglesz - January 15, 2010 5:50 a.m.

    i'm still sticking with xp, its a lovely OS. personally i dont see there being any point in having 6 screens, i mean it would ruin the gameplay having a big line in the middle of the screen with another two lines horizontally. and you'd get a monitor or lcd tv the same size for a forth of the price. just fancy show off shit that any normal thinking gamer would avoid.
  • mentalityljs - January 12, 2010 5:07 a.m.

    @ aion7 I agree, i personally don't feel the need to upgrade until it's required, or until i have the money. Also, fyi there IS a 64-bit XP. It's XP Pro jsyk.
  • JohnnyMaverik - January 10, 2010 6:40 p.m.

    IDK, Windows 7 sounds great when you look at games coming up, but then you look at the games you already have and you're like... eh, can I get Deus Ex running on Windows 7? I'd rather wait until I buy a new machine that comes with it, rather than upgrade this one, that way I'll have a machine with Vista and 7, which suits me great.
  • festafreak - January 9, 2010 7:28 p.m.

    If you are in school, It may only be college/university, you can get win7 for 40 bucks or 30 american (i think). I'm in college in Canada and I went to digitalriver.com and got win7. It is microsofts digital distribution site. Do some research, it's legit. Anyways. I haven't used win7 much yet because all my 'stuff' is on vista still :( It's so hard to get an OS back to where you had your old one. But seriously... 40 bucks for win7 Pro. It's just the upgrade version, but I was able to install it on a new partition.
  • FriendlyFire - January 9, 2010 6:08 p.m.

    7 is probably the best experience I've had with Windows in a while. It's slick, stable and it works well. The GUI is far more responsive than even XP and that for me is the largest plus (well, that and having a workable 64 bit version). To those for whom 7 doesn't work, make sure you didn't use the "upgrade" option. A clean format is the only way to go for OS installs, otherwise you're just begging for issues.
  • Hobojedi - January 9, 2010 5:37 p.m.

    I'm still running XP.. I should probably upgrade soon.
  • richtaur - January 9, 2010 6:34 a.m.

    "The market for netbooks is only going to continue to grow in 2010…" not sure where you're getting that; I've been hearing there's no room in the market for netbooks anymore since the new "superphones" are almost as powerful (Nexus One, etc.). For example: http://recombu.com/news/ten-things-mobiles-have-made-or-will-make-obsolete_M11191.html
  • GameManiac - January 9, 2010 3:59 a.m.

    I can agree with loonyman978 and JustTheBoBreaker on this article. I have Vista (on an HP Pavillion dv9933cl Laptop) and don't have any problems with it, even though i bought it off of a friend for $500. If I were to answer this rhetorical question on Windows 7 being a revolution, I'd say "I don't know because I have Windows Vista and a limited budget."
  • aion7 - January 9, 2010 2:01 a.m.

    If there was a 64-bit XP, I probably wouldn't consider any other OS for gaming. I still don't plan on switching to 7 until it is relatively bug free, and more games require above XP.
  • theturbolemming - January 9, 2010 1:36 a.m.

    Answer: No. I just switched over from Vista to 7 and have since had tons of problems with my games. Red Faction: Guerrilla plays at double speed for some reason, Left 4 Dead 2 spontaneously combusts, Team Fortress 2 only plays on half the screen.... It's horrible.
  • JustTheBoBreaker - January 8, 2010 11:24 p.m.

    I never really had a problem with Vista either. The Windows 7 commercials do make it look pretty awesome though
  • lovinmyps3 - January 8, 2010 11:13 p.m.

    I'm not really a PC gamer but I want Windows 7 anyway. Vista is kinda annoying me.
  • loonyman978 - January 8, 2010 11:07 p.m.

    I've just upgraded my laptop to 7 but tbh, i dont notice any change from vista. I never had a single problem with vista, i dont know why people hated it so much.

Showing 1-15 of 15 comments

Join the Discussion
Add a comment (HTML tags are not allowed.)
Characters remaining: 5000

OR…

Connect with Facebook

Log in using Facebook to share comments, games, status update and other activity easily with your Facebook feed.