Games that didn't need zombies


What the game called them: "Husks"

How the game tried to explain them: They're not zombies! They're… synthetic shells of former human beings, who were impaled on spikes and slowly drained of organic material by a hive of artificially intelligent machines. Plus, they have glowing blue eyes – that's different, right?

Why the game didn't need them: Same reason as Halo – this is science fiction, not survival horror. I'm the captain of a shiny, state-of-the-art spaceship with a crew of highly exotic, highly intelligent and highly diverse aliens at my command, not some depressed widower searching for his dead wife. I'm exploring the farthest reaches of the universe, not looking for a rusty key in an abandoned hospital. Most importantly, I'm playing a goddamn BioWare game – the masters of originality in storytelling – and I shouldn't be encountering anything close to a zombie anywhere in this entire experience.

Oh, the writers and designers did their darnedest to make these clichés interesting. The Husks are made of wires, tubes, lights and circuitry rather than rotting flesh; they can discharge bursts of electricity that disable shields; and they were created with technology that is millions of years old. But in action? During gameplay? They shuffle slowly, they tilt their heads at awkward angles, they stare with blank expressions and they grasp uselessly at the empty air in front of them. They are zombies. And worse yet, so are the Thorian Creepers you fight halfway through the first Mass Effect.

Seriously, BioWare? Two types of zombies? From you, I expected better.

Example of tedious zombie gameplay:


What the game calls them: "Undead Nightmare Pack"

How the game tries to explain them: No explanation necessary! Red Dead Redemption is the only game on this list that doesn't try to disguise its zombies with fancy new nicknames or convoluted back stories. The press release for the planned DLC is straightforward: "Ghost towns and cemeteries come alive in a West gone horribly wrong. 8 new multiplayer zombie characters."

The truth is obviously welcome. The zombies, though? Not so much.

Why the game doesn't need them: I don't have a problem with zombies in Red Dead's multiplayer. They can go ahead and moonwalk to Thriller if they want – that's a separate mode with separate rules and, presumably, a separate reality. What worries me is the other line from Rockstar's email: "Brand new single-player adventure, challenges and quests."

Uh oh. I do have a problem with zombies in Red Dead's campaign. For me, the title's biggest strength is its authenticity – the story and characters may be fictional, but the world and the historical time period they inhabit are remarkably accurate and very carefully researched for a videogame. By the end, your heart aches at the thought of losing America's wild frontier to the inevitable approach of technology because, for 20-30 hours, you really felt like you've lived in that Wild West. Last time I checked, there were no flesh-eating corpses documented in the early 1900s… not even in ghost towns like Tumbleweed.

I'll reserve final judgment on the Undead Nightmare Pack, however, until I've actually seen what Rockstar has planned. After all, the press release also promises "additional animals unleashed in the world"… and if that translates into "zombie grizzly bears," sign me up!

Jul 27, 2010

The Top 7… Villains that never stay dead
No matter how many times you kill them, they always come back for more


8 games that would be better with zombies
Because, save for shopping malls, the undead make everything better


The evolution of videogame zombies
A horrifying history of the shambling flesh-eaters we love to shoot


  • necrorraptor - March 2, 2011 2:05 p.m.

    Well... noting the comment about George Lucas franchise on the Flood section I can't help but remember "Death Troopers". A novel in the expanded universe that is about Han and Chewie fighting....oh well... after reading this article you can imagine what.
  • Memph - September 23, 2010 4:39 a.m.

    husk rushes scared the crap outta me playing on insane. hearing that breathy groan before they stampeded over my team towards me, pegging it in the opposite direction
  • Sala106 - September 10, 2010 11:27 p.m.

    Killing the Sires in Gears 2 was fucking awsome
  • SH00T3R495 - August 2, 2010 5:31 p.m.

    idc what any1 says simply killing zombies is fun and sometinmes challenging, its not fun to just take a shotgun and blow away things attempting to gnaw your face off and in some games it makes your heart race a little bit and its intense. truthfully i hate the flood but they are the story of halo
  • stormofdantess - August 2, 2010 9:55 a.m.

    But I like killing zombies, it's fun. What we need less of is bland human soldiers like Call of Duty and Medal of Honor has to offer. I'd rather kill a zombie. Which is why the only part of COD:WaW I play is Nazi Zombies. I personally love everything Zombies though so I didn't really connected with the article, but thanks Charlie.
  • oryandymackie - August 2, 2010 7:43 a.m.

    Zombies make everything better.
  • xthesawnoffx - July 31, 2010 2:56 a.m.

    not to start anything but technically.. sires arent zombies they are just locusts tested and neglected things the reason they SEEM to be zombies is because they werent "taught" anything all their lives thus making them stupid.
  • Sickooo - July 31, 2010 1:14 a.m.

    @governordyrssen dude whats your problem? you seriously need to calm yourself down...jeez
  • Sickooo - July 31, 2010 1:11 a.m.

    yeah i think that batman arkham asylum actually had some of these disguised zombies in it 2. they were the mentally unstable patients who ran up to you and jumped on your head...while scream in oddly zombie sounding voices
  • humpiedumpie - July 30, 2010 7:46 p.m.

    The zombie grizzly was great haha :P
  • theTYTAN3 - July 30, 2010 6:25 a.m.

    I dont know the flood were cool in Halo 1 because you weren't expecting them. You had no idea what was going on they had the creepy music and the covenant all laying dead around you. You watch an eerie video and then BAM theres an endless wave of little popping things, at first your scared and then your like ok these guys are easy wtf. Then wham you have tons of zombies running at you. You fight your way through them then all the sudden theyre shooting you, getting up after you killed them and exploding in your face. That level scared the crud out of me the first time i played it(probably helped that i used the assualt rifle and the pistol to fight them instead of the shotgun). Halo 2 you knew what to expect and you knew how to kill them they were no longer scary or intense and it was the same with Halo 3 and every single game that tried to duplicate what Halo 1 did with the flood. Which is why I'm really happy that theyre well be no flood in Halo Reach.
  • DriveShaft - July 30, 2010 2 a.m.

    I wanna see RDR zombies :D But agreed that Uncharted didnt need them
  • GamesRadarCharlieBarratt - July 29, 2010 9:27 p.m.

  • smiteboy - July 29, 2010 1 p.m.

    Yeah I guess zombies don't fit in the old west of Red Dead Redemption. That world of GPS and teleporting wouldn't seem realistic with the living dead...
  • philipshaw - July 29, 2010 11:15 a.m.

    I have to agree with most of this article but I didn't mind the zombies in Uncharted 1, I thought it was a good change of pace but I can see why some people hate that bit
  • NobodyLikesPaul - July 29, 2010 6:43 a.m.

    lol i knew mass effect would get said XD
  • governordyrssen - July 29, 2010 6:38 a.m.

    PS thats a sh*tload of stuff wrong wit ur review.....FAG!
  • governordyrssen - July 29, 2010 6:37 a.m.

    this comment is for the halo zombie review: for one thing on halo the flood are just as repetitive as any other F*ckin enemy in the damn game and i think its a good thing they added them because if u get bored woth zombies [flood] u would get bored with every other character too which is what bungie probobly thought [in case u dont get what i said: bungie thinks you will eventually get bored with the covenent repetitive elites, brutes, and grunts so they added a new alien to keep u entertained and not bored with the game plus they dont add them until ur over 3 qrtrs through the game, lastly YES THEIR ALIENS] also if you wouldve not just said f*ck this when u saw what u thought were zombies if u wouldve kept on paying attention you would know the story line and it would make sense to you, you would see that they explain the flood and make them believable just as much as the covenant is.... THE HALO STORYLINE MAKES SENSE, WHOEVER WROTE THAT IS A F*CKING FAG, MOST PEOPLE I KNOW HATE SIERRA 117 LEVEL NOT CORTANA, STAR WARS IS SHIT COMPARED TO HALO, STAR WARS IS SHIT COMPARED TO ALOT OF THINGS, THE GRAVEMIND LOOKS MORE LIKE MY BROTHER THAN A F*CKIN HOUSE PLANT, THE FLOOD IF U WOULDVE PAID ANY DAMN ATTENTION IS NOT GOOEY AT ALL, OF COURSE THEIR GONNA BE UGLY TO U THEIR F*CKING ALIENS,THEIR WERE JUST AS MANY KINDS OF FLOOD AS ALIENS IN "HALO: COMBAT EVOLVED", THE FLOOD IF U PAID SOME F*CKIN ATTENTION ARE THE COVENANT CONTROLED BY A PARASITE SO GUESS WHT U HATE THE FLOOD -> YOU HATE THE COVENANT -> YOU HATE HALO -> YOUR A FAG!,UR TV BRIGHTNESS IS F*CKED UP, THE FLOOD HAS WEAPONS, THE FLOOD ISNT SLOW, THE FLOOD HAVE INTELLIGENCE, THE ONLY THING THE FLOOD AND ZOMBIES HAVE IN COMMON IS THEY ARE LIVING DEAD AND LOOK DEAD, UR A FAG, UR RETARDED BECAUSE THEIR CANT BE THREE HALVES, UR A FAG, AND THEIRS A SH*TLOAD OF OTHER STUFF WRONG WITH UR REVIEW THAT IM NOT GONNA WAST ANOTHER 10 SECONDS TO DISCOVER SO I'LL JUST SAY THIS UR A FAG U DONT DESERVE HALO YOU DONT DESERVE TO REVIEW GAMES, UR HAVE HARDLY ANY ATTENTION SPAN, AND LASTLY [NOT REALLY LASTLY BUT I RAN OUT OF CHARACTERS] WHOEVER WROTE IT IS A FAG [WHEN I SAY UR A FAG IN THIS COMMENT IM SAYING IT TO WHO WROTE THE REVIEW!]
  • Danomeon - July 29, 2010 5:50 a.m.

    Don't forget the first borderland's DLC.. I was very dissapointed that none of the iconic bandits of the game came into the zombie lands at all.. I was imaginging tons of new varieties for those guys. I hate zombies in games where they do not belong, but I can't resist actual games about zombies. I bought both left 4 dead games, dead rising (and soon dead rising 2), and even the bikini samurai squad game. Surprisingly, I enjoyed the monotonous zombie combat, because I like killing mindless foes. I don't know why.
  • Chickenfoot - July 29, 2010 4:03 a.m.

    Oh. I see, we should just cut out the entire Flood part of the halo series? Therefore rendering the halos useless, therefore making the halos never exsist, and all that crap!? So what? You want it to take place on one ship, and be called ........: Combat Evolved? You sir, are stupid.

Showing 1-20 of 108 comments

Join the Discussion
Add a comment (HTML tags are not allowed.)
Characters remaining: 5000