Oh. I seem to have started an argument with a 13 year old.
Your completely irrelevant comment aside, I'll wait till I've read some more independant reviews first. I have no doubt it's going to be a good game, but I'm always a bit sceptical when it comes to taking advice from someone who could be potentially out of a job unless they sell you a product.
Lol, 50 cent beat this? And Street fighter lacks "old school soul"? Both complete loads of crap on ice, but not Killzone 2 baby. Defiantly picking this up.
Hmmmm... this is quite the good game so the reviews say. The PS3 peoples need to keep cranking out titles like this and MGS4. It needs to make up the little bit of lost ground that it has from its early years.
Why am I the only one who seems to notice that the reviews are mostly saying 'well...there is a game here but the GRAPHICS!!! AGH!!! *ejaculation* and that's why it's 5/5.'
Because they're not just talking about the graphics. If you've read the full-length PlayStation Magazine review you'd see that they spent a lot of time talking about the online and campaign modes.
This is kind of unfair because you only used the scores from playstation magazines and just 2 other magazines that only a handful of people have heard about. I'm not saying the game wont be great, I'm saying your being ball chokers and just taking opinions from biased sources. I'm not a fanboy, and I swear if any of you call me that I will come to your house with a knife, cut your throat and fuck the wound. Give a new meaning to the term muscle fucked.