GamesRadar

To be honest, i think that Call of Duty WW is pretty much as MW but,with extras. It said that a few new perks and guns and suff doesnt amke a difference but it does, its the same as MW but with improvements!

Report

And_ROOS - 1 year 6 days ago

Left 4 dead does the whole "killing zombies thing" better then WAW, its JUST another WW2 game. That's why Cod4 took off. People are sick of another gunwank game set in the past with its limitations. In the future, or modern times, there's more leeway to experiment and to express with weapons and strategy. In WW2 strategy was run, hide behind a rock and hope not to die. In Modern times theres scoping technology, infra red, scanners, on and on.

And if your biggest selling points are Co-Op and a fking flamethrower (which isn't even that good to use anyway) then your argument is already lost. WAW is a poorer MW with a lesser story, worse characters and weapons and is just more of the same rehashed WW2 junk we have been few for years.

Report

Viggars - 1 year 6 days ago

After playing COD4 for a year I think everyone expected a totally new game.
As far as I'm concerned, Treyarch might as well have spent 2 years making a new map pack for Â£40/$60.
If you want new maps every day, for free, buy Far Cry 2.

Report

Seantheman10 - 1 year 6 days ago

All this hate guys! I think both are good games, and are both equal to each other. But nobody should say bad things about a game just cause they don't like playing single player. So everybody just take a chill pill and be cool.

Report

TastyCakesMcgee - 1 year 6 days ago

COD 4 FTW.

Report

bassist94 - 1 year 6 days ago

i thought the weapons in waw felt more powerful, or mabye it was just because i was using a controller with vibration when i played it at my friends house

Report

infinite doo - 1 year 6 days ago

wow. you all fail. console arguments, fine. exclusives, ok. but COD4 went multiplatform. so did W@W. theyre on the same consoles and are part of the same series.
What's next?
MoH frontline Vs. MoH rising sun?
Forum Fail. Article Fail. Everyone who posted here just failed. Even me.
In my opinion, the CoD: Finest Hour was the best game of all of them. I expected a same old-same old shooter and the game proved me SO wrong. Who cares about Griggs? I nearly cried when the russian guy who leads you through the first mission got sniped.
I havent played W@W yet, but I've heard its just as good as COD4. Rent it, play it, and stop bickering with your fellow fanboys. If we argue, the Sony kids win.

Report

GamesRadarChrisAntista - 1 year 5 days ago

Wow... I'm sorry to have to announce this but in keeping with infinite doo's wishes, we will be shutting down the internet - effective immediately.

He's right, there's no room in the media for these kinds of opinions or comparisons. Buck up - We had a good run people!

Report

CAPST3R - 1 year 5 days ago

i'm a gun freak so COD4 wins without a doubt. the only WW2 game i need is MOH:AIRBORNE which has all i want from a WW2 game. i'm not going online with ancient guns, i'm going online with modern, professional guns. but MGS4 rules all games, including COD4 and i got bored of COD4 about 4 months ago. i play LBP and MGS4 now, COD4 is REALLY dusty now(well, i dusted for my christmas games tod ay, so all of my games are clean, but you get the metaphor).

Report

thebigmo1 - 1 year 5 days ago

cod4 hands down

Report

TheFish - 1 year 5 days ago

Cod 4 life, chis has chosen the wrong side, godless heathen.

Report

therat - 1 year 4 days ago

@ oreomonkey: co-op should count because it's something CoD WaW has and CoD4 does not, giving CoD WaW an extra point, it's a great addition that Infinity Ward didn't think to include.

Report

Kelsall123 - 1 year 4 days ago

CoD4 easily. The weapons are so much more advanced and have much better attachments. Also, i would rather have as many cluster bombs as i wanted than have the game become harder. If i wanted the game harder, i would play it on veteran. CoD4 is so much better than World at War.

Report

Ausare - 1 year 2 days ago

One to rule them all - with the COD4 engine they needed to at least hit WWII one more time. I hated the game at first (lovCOD4); the inaccurate weapons were the worst but now that I'm used to it I think it's better. I think that COD4 was a little unrealistic with how accurate the weapon would be in real life, shooting an Uzi across the board the killing someone. They worked out the distancing for each weapon more carefully this time around and you have to play more to that weapons ability.
Vehicles are a cool plus along with new perks, grenades and a new section for just rifles.

Oh yea, just played Zombie mode and I would almost buy that on it's own - Fckng awesome!

Report

CoD_22 - 1 year 2 days ago

having co-op on cod5 is a really gd feature but for split-screen multiplayer cod4 is best cuz of crossfire (excellent for sniping) and shipment (awesome for shotguns and rpg's). waw cant compete with cod4's maps.

Report

phreshnutz - 1 year 2 days ago

i dont think so

Report

hardcore_gamer1990 - 1 year 1 day ago

just to say...

COD4 - a war based on terrorism

WaW - a war based on keeping the world from being supressed and overthrown by a facist nazi horde

Morale - No. Contest. WaW

Report

skyloc - 1 year 1 day ago

modern war is better we are moving forward in life let us leave old world wars in the history books

Report

loco_moko - 1 year 1 day ago

I have to argue with what LONGDONGpiChong says because your sniper on the first level comes with a suppressor (silencer) :)

Report

Showing 61-80 of 112 Comments

« PREV 1 2 3 4 5 6 NEXT »