The whole M-rated thing was already covered in 25 things to hate about non-gamers (or something like that) on #17. What most people argue about to no foreseeable end, was summarized in about three lines of text.
While I don't have anything against the rating on a game, I think it depends more on the player's maturity rather than age. I played GTA as a teen and that didn't make me a street thug!
Any argument over what console is better than the others is completely pointless because everyone will support their console and no one will agree on anything
especialy the final boss one in paper mario the thousand year door, i hate having to watch it every time i go to play that stupid demon, plus i have to keep tapping A during it so it will go
if some one was ever on the news for committing a murder, the reporters will ALWAYS try to connect the murder with video games. even though it may turn out the murderer was a mild fan of pac man. bastards!
Yeah growing levels is so overated i'd much rather walk through the game with the same character who gains nothing as the game goes along and do the same tired moves repeatively over and over again
I'd like to add on a comment about how when people want to say they agree with you, they don't take the same journalism care that you did when writing the article to mention it.
They understand that games don't make you a serial killer, you don't have to write "i r not kilr and I play GoW2 lol" or even "lol"
You do realize that as much as that is true, the reason that those techonophobic game haters speak on the subject of kids playing mature games is a real issue and it happens all the time. You people may find it funny, but the reason that the games get released with their rating is because that's how old you should be to play it, and when you get your mom and dad to buy it, you don't win, you make the rest of us lose.