"NOTE: It's a well-known games journalism fact that a newly announced game can be immediately and accurately reviewed by starting at a perfect 10 and subtracting the number of exclamation marks in the press release to arrive at a final score."
back when i was a Journalism major, i was told that a journalist gets 2 exclamation points to use in their entire career. anyone who uses one to fill characters, like the person who inspired the above quote, are idiots.
great article though. i never tire of these things. whenever i read excerpts like these, i try to figure out which words were left out in order to make it sound positive.
the biggest new release so far on console x: its probably crap because the other companies refused to disgrace their console with it and they cba to make a decent game, just say its good and hope most people believe them and spend money on it. im looking at you, haze! i have a ps3 btw, so this isnt a fanboy comment.
[b]"we are shifting focus into developing titles for the value-minded audience (and for the mobile gaming scene)"[/b]
"we 've lost the bet to turn the company into a developer of A-grade games, and now we are back into making crap for the bargain bin, hoping into tricking 10 year olds into forking over their allowance for our excuse of games" See: Majesco
[b]"compelling AI that will trick your brain"[/b]
"CPU opponents will have a massively unfair advantage over your character, because the AI we coded is so damn weak that there is no chance in hell they would get close to beating you in a fair fight"
Most common in the racing genre, where opponents actually drive flying carpets (ex the cops of NFS:hot pursuit 2, or drivers in 4x4 Evo 2)
[b]"realistic simulation of Activity X" (usually includes piloting or driving, but can also be used for trains and ships)[/b]
"the controls will be so stiff you 'll end up crashing somewhere every time you attempt to drive the damn thing"
“!”
“We have used up our quota of the word "exciting" and have only exclamation marks left with which to try to hold your interest”
NOTE: It's a well-known games journalism fact that a newly announced game can be immediately and accurately reviewed by starting at a perfect 10 and subtracting the number of exclamation marks in the press release to arrive at a final score.
This was a recent one from Nintendo:
“…what you’re seeing is this average business model, the typical business model of, say, the five to six year generation of hardware is just not valid anymore. The Wii is a very approachable, accessible platform that’s going to interest gamers for years to come.”
Translation: At the moment we've made so much money from the Wii that we're using £50 bank notes as toilet paper. Spend money on creating new technology in a few years time? Are you mad? Half our new buyers are grannies who think that Teletext has good graphics. We should have spotted this years ago- the Gameboy's graphics were rubbish compared to the Game Gear but people didn't care. Now we're going to milk this cash cow until its udders are sore like we did with the Gameboy and Sony did with the PS1 and PS2.