E3 2011: Editor impressions of the Microsoft press conference

Real games don’t know what the hell to do with Kinect

Theoretically, the technology behind Kinect should lead to all sorts of spectacular innovations in our favorite games. Unfortunately, based on what was shown at Microsoft’s conference, the emphasis is still on “theoretically.”

Mass Effect 3 will add voice recognition, but choosing Shepard’s dialogue options that way leads to a weird disconnect between the player’s voice and the commander’s voice, while shouting commands like “Take cover, Garrus!” and “Use Singularity, Liara!” is a novelty that I believe will wear thin fast.

Ghost Recon: Future Soldier is even stranger, adding motion control to the menus in which you customize weapons (down to the most miniscule parts) and test out those diverse creations on a virtual gun range. I dig this aspect of the game, but won’t waving your hands through dozens upon dozens of tiny, easily confused pieces make this less fun than its assumed counterpart on PS3? Won’t testing the weapon on the range be less informative when there’s no force feedback or precise aiming?

Minecraft was announced for Kinect, but I can’t possibly imagine trying to build a complicated three-dimensional masterpiece by waving your hands. Kinect Star Wars was shown, but was clearly the lightsaber equivalent of a rail-shooter. And Fable: The Journey immediately reminded me of the Kinect version of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, which was only one of the worst-reviewed games of last year.

The possible exception

Remember Codename: Kingdoms, the mysterious Crytek project announced at E3 2010? That’s now officially Ryse, and from what I can tell, a completely Kinect-reliant experience. Strangely, though, I still find myself intrigued. The trailer was unapologetically mature, with soldiers being murdered in the bloody streets of Rome and the player first slashing an enemy with his sword, then kicking the enemy away “This is Sparta”-style and finally launching a spear into the enemy’s horrified face. Ryse could be just another rail-fighter like Kinect Star Wars, but I have faith Crytek would pull something more original off with the motion control technology. We’ll see.

Xbox Live TV, cable killer?

This could be the most exciting announcement of the show – we won’t know for sure, however, until Microsoft provides a lot more information. High-definition? How many channels? Can we pick and choose programming, or do we sign up for a package deal similar to what’s already offered by cable companies? Will region limit what’s available? Could the interactive features displayed during the UFC section of the presentation – audience voting, personal viewing history, semi-Achievements, etc – be expanded to sitcoms, dramas or reality shows? And, most importantly, how much extra will this cost? I’m dying for answers.

Impressions from Official Xbox Magazine

Francesca Reyes, Editor-in-Chief: It's an interesting grass-is-greener mix in that Microsoft appears to be wooing the Wii crowd while Nintendo's possible hardware announce might be aiming to woo the traditional crowd. But at the same time, I'm glad that Microsoft focused on games over pure services. The tease for Halo 4 and Anniversary were great, but felt a little underplayed – think they should've trumpeted those a bit harder, but it’s great to know they're on the way. Surprised that Halo 4 will be on current gen, but couldn't be happier. The Disney and Sesame Street games felt well-pitched even if most core gamers might not be interested. They're perfect for the audiences they're made for without any cynicism.

What did you think of Microsoft’s E3 2011 press conference? Add your opinion in the comments section below.

Jun 6, 2011


E3 Microsoft


  • DrRock - June 8, 2011 9:18 p.m.

    We have a Kinect and it mostly gets played for dancing games, but it's a great way for the family to spend an evening or two together actually playing something we all enjoy. I'm not saying Kinect is great and that MS conference was the best. I wish Kinect would've played a smaller role during the conference; I just don't see MS giving up on pushing this as a way to extend the console's life cycle. Overall I give it a B
  • pimpdaddie - June 8, 2011 12:59 a.m.

    Well I have got to say that I give em a B+ or A-, the conference was great for the gamer audience but for the real world like Micheal Pachter said was a SOLID A for the bing, youtube, tv, new ui, OMG I was so exited !!! Now throw in great 3rd party support, Few BUT THE BEST 1st party games and HOLY SHIT!! Microsoft knows what they are doing! Not only that but with kinect they are opening a new consumers kids! Moms and Dads will have a reason to buy their children a 360, so expect sales to continue to increase for microsoft.Games aside they will kick ass, that is their achelle's heal now new IPs. However Halo 4 is insane, and there is no doubt in my mind that a ton of IPs and have Rare to kick ass! Killer Instinct, Conquers, Banjo Kazooie !!! The only thing that I was disappointed was that they didn't talk about a new zune hd 2, which can help them in the hand held space. Other than that pure awesomeness. Sony's boring conference was a true disappointment! Fuck that they came in last LMAO!!!
  • monkeywolf - June 7, 2011 11:18 p.m.

    Wait, Modern Warfare 3 seriously exceeded expectations? It looked exactly like MW2 and plays in the same manner talk about an utter disappointment. It's just MW 2.5 and MW 2 was really MW 1.5 even blops wasn't that great as it was just MW2 repackaged in the Cold War Era. Come on when are you going to actually do your job and critique this game like it should be, past the hype and bashing it for the repititive BS its been spewing for years now and hasn't innovated AT ALL in over 3 games.
  • Spybreak8 - June 7, 2011 11:15 p.m.

    I'm a Kinect owner, it's alot of fun as a party game system, but jesus that was almost unbearable to watch. I mean yeah why would people who probably aren't even watching be targeted. It seemed Microsoft had made a promise with the Kinect last E3 and they were limited to hold to it this year. Gears 3, Tomb Raider, BF3, Halo CEA, and Halo 4 all looked great. MW3 was cool and all but the whole been there done that feeling kicked in during the cinematic event through the harbor. One thing I liked about the Kinect and Microsoft was that they too realized that enabling it for games is the way to go. Make it an option and not a hindrance.
  • Yeager1122 - June 7, 2011 7:26 p.m.

    Somewhat intrested in Halo 4 but very intrested eand excited for Tomb Raider was the Highlight of an otherwise underwhelming Microsoft show for me defintley cant wait to see more of it.
  • Kethmach - June 7, 2011 7:19 p.m.

    The Halo games were teased and that hurt my soul. But at the same time- they were only trailers. Well, Halo 4 was only a trailer. And that's fine, the game is over a year and a half away. The Remake of Halo showed a little gameplay and that looked awesome. I expect to see more today. So, taking Halo off the table. I got to see some awesome MW3 footage, some INCREDIBLE Tomb Raider footage. I fell in love with Forza all over again. I saw at least 3 games that made me happy about Kinect again- and 3 or 4 games my nephew and niece will be BEGGING for this year (glad their father has a Kinect too). I also saw cool features for Ghost Recon that I wasn't expecting, as well as Mass Effect 3 (Liara- Singularity!). I even saw some cool new features with Bing and YouTube and even the whole dash. And an Avatar that looks like ME! I thought that was a great show. I really don't see why anybody who wasn't just being an asshole would have had any issue with last nights show. At all. Except those stupid horrible kids. They could have been shot off stage with a cannon. (and yet my brother said that's when his two started getting really excited. So... what do I know about marketing to kids).
  • SphincterSquirrel - June 7, 2011 3:14 p.m.

    My Kinect is collecting dust just like the Wii did, voice controls are neat for movies but not much else. But still looking forward to what they do with it. Big Halo fan and of course will pick them up but besides that not a whole lot to wow me. And when playing FPSers dont want to stand in front of the TV and ape the game. No thanks.
  • Romination - June 7, 2011 2:47 p.m.

    Hey, you guys do know that Kinect is optional for those games right? I see a lot of people bitching about it being in future soldier and mass effect but you don't have to use it.
  • GoBlue811 - June 7, 2011 2:35 p.m.

    Thumbs down man. I didn't watch all of it, but I wasn't too impressed by the parts that I did watch (which was the MW3, Tomb Raider part of the conference). Don't get me wrong, the games look great, but over half of the time spent on Kinect? Gross. At least Sony had an emphasis on real games during their conference for the most part. All Nintendo has to do is show off how bad ass the Cafe is (wow, I really can't believe I just said that) and they have E3. Long shot prediction: GTA V will appear on the Cafe.
  • MightyMorphinPoltergeist - June 7, 2011 2:10 p.m.

    Oh knee jerk reactions from the internet how I love thee. @Markoose16 "I don't see why they use any event which is primarily watched and attended by the core audience..." E3 is primarily for investors and media. MSoft sold (iirc) just over 11 million Kinects to date, to think from a business stand point they would forget that and not make more games for that product is absurd. Gamers grow up, we have kids. If I had a son or daughter I would totally play Sesame Street or Disneyland adventure with them, it's just the sort of starter game to get them into our wonderful world of video games. If MSoft can "out Nintendo" while still making games that I wanna play Mass Effect, Halo, Gears, etc than I am all the more for that. For a group of people who claim to love ingenuity we sure are quick to knock a new product. I'm fine with voice in Mass Effect, I liked Tom Clancy's End War, will I use it all the time, probably not but It's a cool start. Also, Yes Star Wars looks painfully stiff and tech demo-y to me but that doesn't mean future iterations wont fix that. Fable Journeys reminded me of Time Crisis or House of the Dead, ie wait for the enemy to pop up then throw a shot at them. If that's the case AND it's co-op I could be down for that, I haven't played either of the prior games in to long and there is no MSoft equivalent. Why are people complaining about MSoft abandoning hardcore? We got Halo 4 announced, Gears 3, Halo HD and an awesome Tomb Raider game that for once; intrigues me enough to want to play TR. Also, how many times can we play sequels of what we already know or own? I am all for embracing a new tech that could change how I play, Gunstringer and Child of Eden are just two games selling me on that new experience for Xbox and i'm all for that. Lastly, poking fun at casual. There's 10 buttons on our controllers, that scares some people, if Kinect can remove that initial obstacle so grandma can have a few minutes of fun with the family, great. That doesn't mean I want shovel ware but if they can make appropriately priced games and hardware to compliment the existing stuff I have while providing a little fun for your family or non gaming friends is awesome. It's the equivalent of Mini Golf, no has to be great at it to have fun. And If you need to be hardcore gamer all the time then that's fine too, MSoft and 3rd party developers have you covered. Don't mind me, I'll just be enjoying both worlds...
  • Pruman - June 7, 2011 1:57 p.m.

    Now that new details are out about the Halo 1 remake, namely that it's the exact same 2001 engine with a new graphics engine running on top, I'm less enthused about it. I was hoping for something more along the lines of the Resident Evil remake on the GameCube or Metroid Zero Mission on the GBA, where they respect the original but add interesting new hooks and fix some of the stuff that didn't work. Now that I know I can just pop my original XBOX copy into my 360 and get the same experience, I'm skipping this one. Halo 1 multiplayer was way too 1337 for me. Getting pistol-killed from the other side of the map and then taunted about how I shouldn't suck so much from the a-holes on the college LAN left a bad taste in my mouth. Microsoft focusing on the Kinect is just doing what they do best, which is copying popular tech that someone else made already, and then driving the original into the ground. Like you guys have said, the Wii and Kinect's target audience buys it, fires it up once, and then never plays it again. Notice how Microsoft hasn't said anything since their announcement that 10 million sold in March? Want to guess why not?
  • CreepersOnSpeed - June 7, 2011 11:37 a.m.

    Ryse :3
  • EDfromRED - June 7, 2011 11:16 a.m.

    Modern Warfare 3 paled in comparision with Battlefield 3. MW3 footage looks like it was copied and pasted from MW 1 or 2, and the enemy AI seemed pitiful -- they might as well have just pop up unarmed with targets on their chests. Battlefield 3 was a revelation, the multiplayer and single player footage was beautiful and intense. I now have zero interest in buying/playing MW3. Overall the Microsoft conference was underwhelmimg. Too much on rails and kiddie Kinect titles, Nothing I saw, except maybe Ryse, would compell me to get Kinect. And I'd rather spend $150 on non-baby controller games.
  • Markoose16 - June 7, 2011 11:06 a.m.

    I was really disappointed with Microsoft and Sony but moreso Microsoft. I don't see why they use any event which is primarily watched and attended by the core audience to show off games for children and the casual audience. If it wasn't for the Halo 4 reveal at the end MS would have had one of the worst conferences I've watched. I did like the Tomb Raider play-through but CoD and Gears just looked like the exact same games as their previous ones. The live tv thing means nothing to anyone outside America and I think in the UK we already have that with SKY player. Youtube seems a bit pointless as surely I can use my PC or phone for that and alot easier too. The Kinect fun labs looked interesting but it's no reason to go out and buy a kinect for. I liked EA's conference and I have high hopes for Nintendo especially if they are focusing more on the core audience with the new console.
  • SausageLozenge - June 7, 2011 10:52 a.m.

    "the good, but not great Halo Reach" Right...
  • jmcgrotty - June 7, 2011 9:05 a.m.

    Soooo many things to comment on. First, the article said "Theoretically, the technology behind Kinect should lead to all sorts of spectacular innovations in our favorite games". I couldn't disagree more. Theoretically, there has never been an intriguing use for the Kinect. 734 days now since the first announcement of Natal/Kinect and no one has found a use for the thing. The Xbox Live TV will (probably) never happen. And if somehow they do screw up and release it, it will not be a success. The biggest factor (which I can see other have already stated) is bandwidth. Even with the ever-increasing infastructure that exists, services aren't, can't and won't keep pace with the increase in bandwidth use. It's asinine to think this is a feasible idea. And last but not least (and this is admittedly more of a personal belief. But one I am confident that any rational person would agree with), the whole pushing of FPS'es is old and worn out. The whole genre has been dying with each and every new release that comes out. Even when consumers screw up and accidentally buy massive numbers of this genre, it really doesn't speak to the quality of the trash being made. Mostly due to online play, the whole genre has turned into the cesspool of the industry.
  • Asmodean - June 7, 2011 8:39 a.m.

    I was happy with the halo Reveals, but only for the continued story and for the remake of a classic game. Tomb-raider was interesting with the new take on Lara and the series, I have high hopes that were seaning the rebirth of a classic. Gears was a waste; ya its coming, ohh and there big monsters to kill... ahh nothing else new ehh, well that nice... next. The same can be said for MW3 it all kiss kiss bang bang, and at the end of the day we'll have an 8 hour campaign that most likely wont make a bit of sense because all they focus on is multi-player. And then came kinect game after kinect game, one sorry excuse for a entertainment after the next, it was almost enough to make me gag with furry as I tried desperately choke down the bile rising forth with each worthless entry. Even now I can feel the flames of hell lapping at my nuts just thinking about the last half of that press conference. But I digress, at lest it was better then the reveal of Kinect last year...
  • CitizenWolfie - June 7, 2011 8:35 a.m.

    I thought the Sony one was pretty disappointing but I think this was even worse. Both keep hyping their motion controls despite nobody (core audience at least) caring about them. Halo and Gears are wasted on me unfortunately as none of the previous instalments have won me over. That leaves MW3 and Tomb (Island?) Raider. Both Multiplatform. Doesn't bode that well really. I think it'll be Nintendo's year this year. Just hope they delivery some awesome 3DS games now.
  • Defguru7777 - June 7, 2011 7:53 a.m.

    I actually liked the Gears 3 demo. Cliff Bleszinski said during his time on G4 that the reason Marcus didn't get into the Silverback was because they wanted to show off some intricacies of the co-op. While one player shot the Lambent Leviathan with the Silverback, Marcus used him as cover to fire on it. Not saying it was the best decision, just saying why the decision was made. I agree with Reyes about how Halo 4 and Halo Anniversary being underplayed. Those were the highlights of the conference for me. I'm still giddy from happiness with that trailer for Halo 4. I'll admit that the Modern Warfare 3 demo was better than I thought it'd be, but it wasn't really that original. There were plenty of slow-mo breaches in MW2, and I didn't particularly like driving a powerboat during the game's finale. Not saying it was bad, but I wasn't really blown away. Personally, I thought Gears 3's demo was a lot more entertaining.
  • omegakulu - June 7, 2011 7:51 a.m.

    how many people have the bandwidth to stream tv on top of their netflix, and day to day internet usage with ISP enforcing smaller caps by the year...outside of kiddy kinect stuff and multiplat, Gears is Gears, Halo4 might have a fresh look, but can't get rid of the feeling of milking the franchise when they announce not one but 4 Halo games, include CE remake. Overall pretty blah...

Showing 1-20 of 23 comments

Join the Discussion
Add a comment (HTML tags are not allowed.)
Characters remaining: 5000


Connect with Facebook

Log in using Facebook to share comments, games, status update and other activity easily with your Facebook feed.