Battle of the GTAs

Grand Theft Auto 2
1999 | Dreamcast, PC, PSone, Game Boy Color

The setup: The other GTA that nobody played, Grand Theft Auto 2 continued the top-down, points-for-kills action of its predecessor, but this time gave it a little more structure. Instead of just taking on random jobs for crime bosses, you'll need to curry favor with seven gangs, chief among them the Zaibatsu corporation, which affects how they treat you as you stomp through their territory. Other than that, though, it's largely the same game with a significant visual upgrade, a more overtly goofy sense of humor and a live-action opening movie.

The rides: A bunch of quasi-futuristic cars and trucks that feel a little smoother and a lot faster than the vehicles in the original GTA.

The criminal: An amnesiac ex-convict named Claude Speed, who may or may not be the same mute sociopath that stars in GTAIII.

The town: The sprawling near-future metropolis of Anywhere City, which was carved up into downtown, industrial and residential districts.

The music: Still tied to the cars you drive, although the PC version enables players to switch between the game's 11 stations. The stations themselves feature an eclectic mix of pop, rock, hip-hop and electronica. This was also the beginning of a tradition: weirdo DJs for each station, who chat with listeners and generally make asses of themselves.

The violence: The guns, explosions and blood are all noticeably cooler and more realistic than in the first game, but still pretty cartoony. Also, it's not just the cops who'll chase you when you do bad things this time around - depending on how long and bloody your spree gets, you'll face gradually tougher levels of law enforcement going all the way up to the army.

Why it's the best: It's a big improvement over the first GTA, and takes itself even less seriously. It's faster, too, and slamming through crowds of pedestrians and watching the reward points explode all over your screen is still an undeniable thrill. The whole gang-rivalry dynamic adds some depth to the anarchic structure, and gives players a choice in whom they want to work for and betray - which later games in the series don't.

Why it isn't: It's still hard as hell to control cars on a 2D plane, even if the visuals are considerably better. There's still not much of a story, either, no matter what the opening movie implies. Also, you can't even save your game until you have $50,000 to your name, which is weak.

Does it hold up? It's better than the original, but let's be realistic - it's not going to hold its own against anything in the following pages. Try it out for yourself and see.

We Recommend By ZergNet


  • JosefMotley - February 15, 2010 9:26 a.m.

    Personally I think there should have been a "no winners" result. Not because I hate GTA. but because i loved it so much and have been continually disappointed by the series since vice city. obviously GTA3 is pretty much unplayable now and has no in-game map and ridiculous missions. by comparison, when vice city came out it felt like the franchise had been suddenly sold to nintendo - it was actually fair and fun for the first time. sadly they messed vice city up not with the game itself but with its painfully bugged, rushed and ultimately intensely overrated sequel san andreas. though san andreas was by almost all areas the worse game, the fact it finally introduced climbing meant it ruined vice city. san andreas is terrible plotwise in comparison and while it has some good missions, has far too many bad ones i never want to replay again. and now every time i try and play vice city again i'm just frustrated that you can't climb (couldn't care less about swimming, it was actually less annoying just dying in vice city, in san andreas falling in the usually led to deliberately drowning yourself instantly anyway, it was either that or swim round the coastline of somewhere for hours trying to find something you could climb up... AND THEY HAD LADDERS IN THAT GAME THAT WERE JUST FOR SHOW AND YOU COULDN'T CLIMB BUT STUCK OUT OF THE WATER TEMPTINGLY NONETHELESS. HOW DARE THEY) anyway so san andreas by introducing ONE good new feature managed to run the entire back catalogue of the series into the ground for good. question is: can you climb in vice city stories? if so, that's the only decent GTA left. i need to play it again and properly, not drunk in a roomful of people taking it in turns this time....
  • A.J_Smiles - November 9, 2008 9:47 p.m.

    Gang, I was rooting for Vice City. I mean San Andreas is obviously better, but VC was my first GTA game ever and I love it

Showing 1-2 of 2 comments

Join the Discussion
Add a comment (HTML tags are not allowed.)
Characters remaining: 5000


Connect with Facebook

Log in using Facebook to share comments, games, status update and other activity easily with your Facebook feed.