Google+

Are games more violent today?

Shares

The Game: Bullfighting
Developer: The Spanish
Release date:
18th century
Genre:
Action
Number of players:
1
Rating:
Rated M for gory deaths, animal cruelty, and the excessive use of capes.

Nothing says 'I love you' like the bloody carcass of a bull. Royal weddings and military victories were often celebrated with the public slaying of bulls during the Middle Ages before the Spanish evolved bullfighting into the sport that made Ernest Hemmingway feel like a real man.

Not much has changed since the early 18th century, when the spectacle of horsemen spearing a bull to death was restructured to focus more on the drawn out battle between the matador, a well-dressed swordsman, and the bull. Today, the bull doesn't stand much more of a chance against its human opponent. Despite modern regulations that prohibit drugging the bull and shaving its horns (to throw off its sense of balance), the matador's troupe of picadors still trot about on horses and drive lances into the bull's back, twisting them to drain its blood prior to the fight. This weakens the bull and reduces its mobility, making it easier for the matador to land a final killing blow between the bull's shoulder blades.



Above: Achievement Unlocked: If the crowd is pleased by the matador's victory, he will remove the bull's ear and tail, tossing them to the crowd

We Recommend

32 comments

  • cleverandruthless - October 28, 2009 6:31 a.m.

    Great article, though i would have preferred more recent, American examples of violent pastimes(i.e. bear-baiting and goose-pulling). As for sexual business, the "cockeldy bread" dance comes to mind... :)
  • oryandymackie - October 15, 2008 3:27 p.m.

    I'm sick of government and co. saying that, oh, we ca't play this. It's fiction. Definition of fiction. Imaginary. Unrealistic. I play horrors but I don't want to carve up people like Christmas dinner with a chainsaw.
  • Scott1121 - October 15, 2008 8:40 p.m.

    5th woohoo
  • Ravenbom - October 15, 2008 3:10 a.m.

    I find it surprising that a game where 11 steroid pumped beef-castles are facing off against another 11 raging shrunken testicle/bacne (back acne) meat mountains who all want to kill each other and only wear flimsy vinyl tunics and plastic plates on their shoulders isn't seen as violent, even after 20 years of Madden. Yet you kill one little hooker to get back your money, and GTA3 stirs up controversy.
  • Valandil - October 14, 2008 11:47 p.m.

    2nd! Yay!
  • lilspooks3 - March 28, 2009 4:13 a.m.

    so.. i kinda really liked the manhunt video. does that mean im messed up in my head, if this kinda stuff "excites" me :]
  • mattkarl1992 - March 1, 2009 10:51 p.m.

    if somebody has the balls to mimic GTA in reality, there is somthing wrong with that person to begin with. games don't make people do things.
  • nadrewod999 - February 28, 2009 4:28 a.m.

    sorry about my post 2 months ago, I guess my slow computer didn't sense me typing any "e"s for a while
  • P0ck3tC1am - February 23, 2009 2:26 p.m.

    you guys got to remeber the most "deadliest" game these guys ever played probably went like this: blip blip blip blip blip blip blip blip blip blip DAMNIT!
  • StevenHawking - January 11, 2009 9:38 p.m.

    Okay, I want to play manhunt 2 now. That, and I want to see some good gladiator games now.... Someone should call Rockstar and say, "Make me a brutally horrific gladiator fighting game, and we'll call it historical license."
  • adrenaguy - January 5, 2009 7:16 p.m.

    yeah I'm sorry but it's like how they said that mass effect was a "sex simulator" well i have found plenty of them on the we doing that and ONLY that, and , as you said, el_hombre 11 the government should see films like that and realise, hey, this is just as bad! in fact, it'snot bad at all, neither are. because it's FICTION. as in the "it's not real but we like it because it's something we couldn't do" it's like when i go on rollercoaster sims, i build totally insane roller coasters and ride them just to see what it would be like to ride it, doesnt mean i'm gonna go build a coaster that creates Gs up to 45 now am I? no. that's just plain stupid. and impossible. so stop bugging us government and tbh, take it like a man and realise that it's not the gamers who kill people, it's the kids with bad parenting etc. they are the criminals, the robbers, the murderers, you get the Gist, get all the money put into "proving"(getting a load of criminals and asking if they play video games) that games are at fault and put it into helping those who are having trouble with their lives, help parents, help schools, and most importantl, help the criminals. b***h.
  • Smiffy99 - December 31, 2008 12:22 a.m.

    Okay um...one, two,...uh, 14th! Woo! I'm really on top of it!
  • Smiffy99 - December 31, 2008 12:22 a.m.

    Okay um...one, two,...uh, 14th! Woo! I'm really on top of it!
  • TrigunGunner - December 28, 2008 4:43 a.m.

    I hate how the politicians and all these government big shots go yacking about how bad games are how violent and mature they are, yet other forms of media like movies and books get none of that criticism
  • Corsair89 - December 23, 2008 8:19 a.m.

    damn, double post
  • Corsair89 - December 23, 2008 8:18 a.m.

    Yeesh, some of the Manhunt 2 kills made me cringe. Brutal.
  • El_Hombre11 - December 22, 2008 6:14 a.m.

    the Gov. just needs to get it in their minds that Video Games are simplistic in the same way as movies, people watch/play them to ESCAPE REALITY. You watch Wanted, Lord of the Rings, the Matrix, Batman, or SisterHood of the Traveling pants kauz you want to know WHAT IT WOULD BE LIKE if it were real. Some people play Madden kauz they love football and maybe, huh, would actually want to have the unnatural ability to control some of their favorite players. Imagine that!!! Games weren't made to duplicate reality and breed a bunch of cyberkillers, thats what the internet is for Games were made to replace reality with anything we want at the time
  • CoD_22 - December 21, 2008 3:21 p.m.

    you would have to be pretty insane in the first place to kill someone because of playing gta. you play games because you can do things you wouldnt normally do in real life.
  • Geoffish - July 9, 2009 12:43 p.m.

    The thing that makes no sense about the general media's supposed "understanding" of games as a form of media is how they always want to protect their children. "Wont somebody please think of the children? He played GTA and now is a violent, sexual deviant!" I totally agree that young children shouldn’t be playing games with ratings above their age BUT that what ratings are for! "Your son shouldn’t have been playing GTA, he’s 10!" If the people think it’s acceptable for films that are unsuitable for children to be released in the cinema and then for retail then games should be treated the same way. It should be the parent’s responsibility to stop their children from playing games that are too mature for them. For instance if I ever have children I will play computer games with them (if they want to). However I won’t recommend playing a GTA title with them, until they are old enough. I think I'll just finish with saying I don’t believe that games do make people go crazy. However say I did go crazy and try to recreate my fave GTA level, the hardest part for me would be securing a firearm, maybe access to weapons should be the topic, and not whether games affect us at all. Also, this was probs the wrong place to post this, is there an artical about the media's understanding of games?

Showing 1-20 of 32 comments

Join the Discussion
Add a comment (HTML tags are not allowed.)
Characters remaining: 5000

OR…

Connect with Facebook

Log in using Facebook to share comments, games, status update and other activity easily with your Facebook feed.